LOGIN |  SIGN UP

Login to CARLIGIOUS

Username *
Password *
Remember Me

Join CARLIGIOUS now

Registration is FREE
Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required.
Name *
Username *
Password *
Verify password *
Email *
Verify email *
Captcha *

Forza Ferrari

Being an avid car lover, Carligious is my elected platform to talk about the wonderful device that is the motor vehicle. And if you're not sure, yes I especially love Ferraris

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder - 2017 Bugatti Chiron

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder - 2017 Bugatti Chiron

I know I don't get what it's like to be uber rich. I'm so far removed from an adequate frame of reference that I'll never understand the lifestyles of the rich and famous.

Why am I saying this? Well no matter how hard I try, I can't find any love for the new Bugatti Chiron.

The Chiron is the latest limited edition, mega expensive ($3.6 Million) hypercar from Bugatti. It made its official debut at this year's Geneva International Motor Show.

Yes its super exclusive, yes I'll probably never see one in real life, yes the engineering is phenomenal, yes it will be a great drive, and yes it's the new hypercar king. But ugh, why is it so ugly?

My first reaction on seeing the press photos - it doesn't know what it wants to be?

I never thought the Veyron was a great looking car but this is worse! I respect that from an engineering point of view it's the best of the best but why can't it look the best?

This is probably going to put some people's nose out of joint; If the object of the design exercise was to cause attention, to be truly unique and to be instantly recognisable as anything but a Bugatti, they've nailed it.

Nothing seems to mesh. Front on, the homage to the pre-war Bugatti old school horseshoe grill, just doesn't work. It looks like a tacked on afterthought. Sure have a reference to the cars original lineage but they could have substitutued the horseshoe motif as a small stylised badge rather than the clown nose it appears as. It makes the whole thing overly bulbous.

I'm also not sure why there's a prominent crease on the bonnet? Makes it look dated and overly complex, no doubt it performs some sort of aero function.

I have to say the headlight arrangement is cool and for my money the absolute standout feature of the car, if they employed that kind of styling theme to the whole it would have won me over.

Don't even get me started on the crucial side view, it looks like they got two cars and mashed them together even though they don't really fit, then stuck hoola-hoops where the bodies join to try and cover it up. It's like they were trying to be way too clever.

Looking at the silhouette of the car itself, it has the lines of an exotic beast but is ruined by too much frippery.

Is it because it has to stand so far above the mainstream that the stylists had to show excess to meet the expectations of its intended market?

From the rear three quarter view, the car does look menacing and is probably the least offensive... still you can't avoid the tacked on hoola-hoops which disturbs an otherwise flowing line.

All of this is exacerbated by the Geneva show car as it has a lurid two tone blue paint job that highlights just how busy a design it is.

Consider the wheels - again, what were they thinking? HSV (Holden Special Vehicles) produced a very similar rim several years ago which were dropped because they were unpopular with the punters.

Talking about the interior is a whole different ball game. It comes across to me as a lot more successful than the exterior of the car though I do find the steering wheel a little overly fussy. The rest of the environment looks just as you'd expect from such a high end vehicle. The attention to detail is stellar. The seating and ergonomics look like there is nothing to distract you from the business of driving.

And when we say driving, we mean the car is capable of motion that would scare a formula one rival, let alone that it can be driven on public roads. There's talk that with the speed limiter removed the car could top out at 463Kmh! (288Mph)

Ok, I've had my whinge, but don't think for a second I wouldn't give my first born for a chance to drive one. Let's get to the bit we all care about, the performance.

Here's the roundup.

BY THE NUMBERS

2017 Bugatti Chiron approximate price $3.6 million dollars.

Engine: 8.0 Litre W16 quad turbo charger

Power output: 1103Kw (1500hp)

Torque: 1600Nm

Kerb weight: 1995Kg (dry)

Transmission: 7 speed dual clutch, all-wheel drive.

PERFORMANCE

0 – 100Kmh dash: sub 2.5 seconds

Top speed: 420Kmh (speed limited)


Picture source: Bugatti

...what’s it all about? Performance Cars: Part 2
The Bavarian BAHNSTORMING WUNDERKIND - 272Kw M2

Related Posts

 

People in this conversation

Please login to comment
  • I think the styling is appropriate for that carries the name of a great artistic family .It may not be to everybody's taste but neither was Etorie's dads work . A piece of which resides in the Adelaide Art Gallery .
    The styling is dramatic ,a statement and not easily copied without an outcry of copycat .
    Just sit with a pencil and paper and see if you can come up with a car style that has not been seen before . So****ing that people can't say or it looks like this or that or a bit of both rolled into one .
    I have been lucky to have driven a couple of Bugs I would love a go at this one .

  • That's what I love about cars Gerrard, that we as car lovers can be so passionate about what we love and we can all bring so****ing to the table. I think what you're saying is valid, it definitely is dramatic and very much unique. It's subjective, I just expressed how I felt about the styling. I'm also not that keen on a lot of the styling Lamborghini employ, for me I think their pinnacle was the Muira. I envy you having driven a Bug, what an experience that would be.